Skip to Content
Indiana University

Search Options




View Options

[Hide Table of Contents]
Justin Harley. Cooke, John Esten, (1830–1886).
Requires cookie*[Print]
no previous
next
page: (Illustration) [View Page (Illustration) ]

[View Figure]

"HE FELL BACK WITH A CRY."—P.266.

page: (TitlePage) [View Page (TitlePage) ]

JUSTIN HARLEY: A Romance of Old Virginia.

BY

JOHN ESTEN COOKE,

AUTHOR OF "THE VIRGINIA COMEDIANS," "SURRY OF EAGLE'S NEST." "DR. VANDYKE," ETC.Illustrated by W. L. Sheppard.

PHILADELPHIA: CLAXTON, REMSEN & HAFFELFINGER, 624, 626 & 628 MARKET STREET.

1875.
page: 3[View Page 3]

Entered, according to Act of Congress, in the year 1874, by TO-DAY PRINTING & PUBLISHING CO., In the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington, D. C.

PREFACE.

WHEN a book is finished, and the weary hand lays down the pen, a writer is apt to lean back in his chair, fall into reverie, and ask himself what will be the probable fate of his venture when launched on the often stormy ocean of letters. The moment is an anxious one if his temperament is timid—an interesting one, however cool and philosophic he may be. The last page deposited on the pile containing so many other pages completes a task which has absorbed more or less of his life. And if he is a conscientious laborer—an architect who will not leave any portion of his building incomplete, or filled up with rubbish—he has not shrunk from this exhausting toil. Day after day and week after week—month after month, it may be, and even year after year, sometimes—he has forgotten the outer world, with all its allurements, to live in the world of his imagination. Time has passed for him like a dream, and he has seen only the figures of his Dreamland. While the sun has been shining, and happy idlers have been basking in its light and warmth, he has not seen it, or has closed his eyes to it, absorbed in his ever-recurring toil. The birds have not sung for him, or the flowers bloomed—nor has night, even, brought him rest. The wind sighing around the gables has lulled others to healthful sleep—he has watched, and not slept, hearing the old clock mark the hours one by one as they passed away; a solitary toiler, recording the histories of the men and women of his fancy, who have been to him the real men and women of his life—far more real than those of his actual acquaintance. He has seen their smiles or their frowns—entered into all their feelings—sympathized with their joys and sorrows, their tears and their laughter, until these persons of his imagination have come to be real persons page: 4-5[View Page 4-5] sons, nay, old friends, whom he loves and would not part with. But the moment has come at last when he must bid them farewell—when he will no longer hear their voices or see their faces smile on him alone. They are known only to him now: to-morrow they will be known to the world—or at least to a small portion of it. What will that world think of them?—that they are agreeable people, or dull people? Will they make friends everywhere, or enemies instead? What will be their fate in the great world which they are about to enter?

An author who has labored conscientiously to produce something worthy to be read—which can do no harm and may do some good—must muse after some such fashion as this on the reception of his work, anticipating the probable criticisms it will arouse. In the case of the volume before the reader, this criticism may be foretold with tolerable accuracy. The incidents are singular, and may be styled improbable—a term which means, colloquially, untrue to nature—and the truth of this criticism, as applied to such works, is worthy of a brief examination.

What, after all, is improbable in this world? What occurrence is singular? The singular is not the improbable. Men rise and make their toilettes, and go to their affairs, and return home to sleep—and this routine goes on year after year, with little or no interruption. But are there no other lives which are subjected to greater vicissitudes? Is life always commonplace, and the current untroubled? Alas! it is tragic and frightful, often; it does not always flow quietly; it is broken into foam, and rushes violently under the influence of subterranean forces—the passions of wrath, hatred, the greed of gold, or of lust, or murder. You take up a newspaper, and there is a crime in every column; or a volume of memoirs, and an "improbable" incident occurs in every chapter. Most men who have passed forty have heard private family histories so strange and terrible that they affect the mind like a nightmare. And yet these crimes, "improbabilities," and deeds so fearful that they are only whispered under the breath, were actual occurrences, and not distortions of an unbridled fancy—as real events in the lives of human beings as the most commonplace incidents of every-day existence.

The experience or the reading of every one must have proved to him the existence of this "night side" of human nature—this strange phase of life—and it is difficult to understand why a writer should be forbidden to delineate it. If he ventures to do so, nevertheless, his work is styled "sensational," and he is ranked with the "exciting" school of writers. And yet no writers are more exciting than the great masters of the art—let us say Shakespeare and Scott. The one paints in Hamlet a human being warned by a ghost, stabbing a councillor, fighting in a grave, and killed by a poisoned rapier; in Macbeth a soldier wading through blood to the crown promised him by witches; while Scott shows us the Countess of Leicester dashed to death on the stones of Cumnor, and Ravenswood engulphed in the treacherous quicksand, while Lucy Ashton crouches with the bloody knife in her hand, raving mad, after murdering her husband. In the dramas and romances of these two great masters of the art of writing, the passions of the human heart run riot and are drawn in vivid colors. The incidents are no less strange and tragic, too, than the passions. That the passions and incidents are more violent than those of everyday life does not make the writings improbable, if the meaning of the term be untrue to nature.

The theory of criticism here briefly urged seems to the writer to be based on just principles, and necessarily involves a defence of certain modern writers from the charge of exaggeration and unnaturalness in their books. This charge may be true in many instances—it is true unquestionably of many of the bad and corrupting novels of the French "literature of desperation;" but it does not seem fair when applied to other productions of the so-called "exciting" school.

Against the works of these writers, however, and perhaps, in some measure, against the volume here presented to the reader, page: 6-7 (Table of Contents) [View Page 6-7 (Table of Contents) ] may be urged a very dangerous criticism—that they depend largely for their interest on the element of mystery, introduced to excite the reader's curiosity. This may not be a "crime," and unfortunately the general reader seems to prefer above all things this gross flavor of mystery. That the proceeding, however, is a "blunder," if the writer looks to the best audience, and to permanent fame, there is very little reason to doubt. From the moment when a drama depends for its interest solely on this "mystery," and the writer expends his force in laying a trap to catch the reader's curiosity, the true end of dramatic composition is lost sight of, and the book becomes ephemeral. It is read for the plot, and the plot once unravelled, it is thrown aside—the reader, absorbed in it but now, and unable to lay down the volume, wishes never to lay his eyes upon it again!

Such is the fatal mistake of those writers depending solely upon curiosity—the curiosity once satisfied, all interest vanishes, and the volume is suddenly forgotten. The fact will be acknowledged by every reader, and is noticed by an eminent European critic.

"Whence this sudden and profound silence," he says, "following a renown mounting to the stars—this indifference after so many passions? That is easily explained. Curiosity will not suffice to make a work endure. It must contain, in addition, pity, love and terror, rising in eternal tears from the very depths of the human heart."

Words as true as they, are eloquent! The book depending for its interest on the curiosity alone of the reader, is destined to a brief career; no one re-reads it, and it is speedily forgotten. Love, pity and terror are necessary to the drama that is to last—for they come from the heart of the writer and speak to the heart of the reader. They entered into the dramas of a few Greek writers more than two thousand years ago; and these dramas still live and move the world, while the "mystery" novel of the last month is already forgotten.

VIRGINIA, 1874.

CONTENTS.

no previous
next