Skip to Content
Indiana University

Search Options




View Options


The days of Shoddy. Morford, Henry, (1823–1881).
no previous
next
page: (Cover) [View Page (Cover) ]

[View Figure]
THE DAYS OF SHODDY

page: Illustration[View Page Illustration]

[View Figure]
Henry Morford

page: (TitlePage) [View Page (TitlePage) ]

THE DAYS OF SHODDY. A NOVEL OF THE GREAT REBELLION IN 1861.

BY

HENRY MORFORD.

AUTHOR OF "SHOULDER-STRAPS."

PHILADELPHIA: T. B. PETERSON & BROTHERS, 306 CHESTNUT STREET.

page: 21[View Page 21]

Entered, according to Act of Congress, in the year 1863, by T. B. PETERSON & BROTHERS, In the Clerk's Office of the District Court of the United States, in and for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

TO
HON. CHARLES P. DALY, JOHN R. BRADY AND HENRY HILTON,
JUDGES OF THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
OF THE
CITY AND COUNTY OF NEW YORK,
DURING
THE THREE YEARS OF WAR FOR THE UNION,
WHO HAVE NOT ONLY
KEPT SPOTLESS THE JUDICIAL ERMINE,
BUT
DISCOUNTENANCED ALL DISLOYAL PRACTICES
AND
HELD THE GOLDEN MEAN OF PATRIOTIC CONSERVATISM,
THE TRUE DEMOCRACY,—
THIS STORY OF THE OPENING DAYS OF THE GREAT STRUGGLE
IS
RESPECTFULLY DEDICATED
BY THEIR
FRIEND AND SERVANT IN THE SAME FAITH,

THE AUTHOR.

NEW YORK CITY, DEC. 1ST, 1863.
page: 22-23[View Page 22-23]

PREFACE.

THE Days of Shoddy, as the reader will readily anticipate, are the opening months of the present war, at which time the opprobrious name first came into general use as a designation for swindling and humbug of every character; and nothing more need be said to indicate the scope of this novel. It would be easy for the writer, if he felt disposed to forestall criticism, or if he doubted that the work itself would be found its own apology,—to point out those features in its construction most likely to provoke unfavorable comment, and to prove (at least to his own satisfaction) that all such points, possibly to be considered blemishes by others, were really beauties of the first prominence. The fact is, meanwhile, that he does not feel that any prefatory apology is necessary, while he does recognize the propriety of a few words of explanation that may not be supplied by the body of the work. The considerable number of footnotes appended in certain portions, giving to the book at times more the appearance of a dry statistical volume or an erudite history than a mere work of current romance, may be regarded as an innovation, but the writer hopes cannot be considered objectionable in a novel having for its foundation the hard facts of contemporary history,—in spite of the denunciations of August William Schlegel, the distinguished German critic and essayist, against page: 24-25 (Table of Contents) [View Page 24-25 (Table of Contents) ] "notes to a poem," which he declares to be as much out of place as "anatomical lectures on a savory joint served up at table." The objection may lie quite as strongly against "notes to a novel"; but if so, Sir Walter, whose prefatory and appendiary remarks in many of his novels were merely notes set in another form, must be called as the quite sufficient antagonist of the German.—A second objection might lie against the discursive character of certain portions of the work, but it is hoped will not do so when we remember how we trifle with side-issues that seem pleasant, in every relation of life, from the child turning aside to pluck flowers or catch butterflies on his way to school, to the soldier loitering his night at the theatre when he knows that the interests of the country call him to hurry on to the field without an hour's delay.—And still a third might be urged against the large aggregate of denunciation of national vices, with so small a proportion of pointed personalities; while the explanation of that feature, if any is necessary, lies in the belief that the exposure of the vices and follies of the time will be found much more effectual for the common good, if it indicates, and provokes examination of official documents, than it could be if it closed inquiry as well as excited it, by merely gibbeting a few prominent wrong-doers, under their real names. The writer, in conclusion, takes the opportunity of thanking press and public for the very great kindness shown to a previous venture in the same direction, and of promising that if their favor continues, the mine of romance of the rebellion, thus opened, will not be allowed to lie unexplored.

NEW YORK CITY, Dec. 1, 1863.

CONTENTS.

no previous
next